

Organizations everywhere are adopting AI with the hope that work will finally feel smoother and more connected. Many expect that once these tools are in place, information will become instantly accessible and employees will no longer lose time hunting through folders or asking colleagues for documents. Yet the reality inside most institutions is very different. Even with AI at their fingertips, staff still spend surprising amounts of time searching, recreating work, and relying on memory because the systems around them feel unreliable. According to research from the McKinsey Global Institute, the average knowledge worker spends 1.8 hours every day (or 20-25% of their time) searching for and gathering information.
AI can accelerate how organizations work, but it cannot compensate for information that is scattered, outdated, or inconsistently structured; it can also create risks associated with inadvertently accessing incomplete, inaccurate, and ungoverned documents and data. This gap points to a concept many organizations might be hearing about in the AI ether but unaware of how it could apply to their circumstances: knowledge retrieval.
Knowledge retrieval is the practice of ensuring people can quickly and confidently access the information they need within the context of their work. It is broader than search and deeper than document storage. It brings together information structure, workflow design, governance, and AI.
As organizations begin exploring what AI can do for them, a term they often encounter is RAG, or Retrieval-Augmented Generation. RAG is a method that allows AI tools to pull information from your organization’s documents, data, and knowledge sources at the moment a question is asked. Instead of relying solely on the AI model’s general knowledge, RAG “retrieves” relevant internal content, then uses that content to generate an answer that is tailored to your organization.
In theory, this is powerful. It means AI can draft reports, summarize material, answer questions, or synthesize information using your organization’s own knowledge, not just what it learned during training.
But for RAG to work well, the underlying information needs to be structured, current, and meaningfully described. This is where concepts like embeddings, metadata, and tags come in.
At a high level:
If the content is messy, inconsistent, or poorly labeled, the AI retrieves the wrong material and produces vague or incorrect answers. If the content is well-curated, the AI becomes dramatically more accurate and more useful.
This is why knowledge retrieval is foundational to AI strategy. Without it, RAG cannot produce meaningful, trustworthy results. With it, organizations finally break the cycle of time leakage that has frustrated teams for years.
Tools like Microsoft Copilot or Google Gemini include basic retrieval capabilities, but they are designed to work across millions of different organizations. They make broad assumptions and cannot understand the nuance of your domain, your vocabulary, or your workflows. As a result:
The result is answers that are generic, incomplete, or disconnected from the real work your teams do. Leaders are left wondering why tools that appear powerful struggle to generate reliable, contextual insights.
A more effective approach starts with understanding what people actually need to retrieve, not with reorganizing everything at once. Focusing on the highest-value workflows creates early wins. Aligning documents and data to real tasks helps AI retrieve more relevant content. Reducing duplication and clarifying sources of truth dramatically improves the accuracy of RAG-based systems.
From here, governance becomes a set of simple, intentional habits that keep information trustworthy. This creates the conditions AI needs to produce high-quality outputs and reduces wasted time across teams.
Tensory’s work emphasizes curation: shaping and structuring an organization’s knowledge so that AI tools can actually understand and use it with maximum effectiveness, accuracy, and satisfaction. Instead of assuming your existing environment is AI-ready, we help you refine it so that retrieval systems, including RAG, perform reliably and meaningfully.
This approach produces stronger results because:
In our work with SCIUS Advisory and others, teams saw immediate reductions in search time and significant improvements in the quality of AI-assisted outputs.
If you are exploring AI and wondering why the results still feel shallow or inconsistent, the issue is not the tool. The issue is curation and retrieval. Fixing this first allows AI to finally deliver the value organizations have been promised.
With the right structure, AI becomes sharper, faster, and dramatically more reliable.
And everything, including productivity, onboarding, decisions, research, reuse of knowledge, becomes easier.
Reach out to Tensory and we’ll arrange a discovery conversation to learn how this can be applied to your organization!